ProjectPhysX / ProjectPhysX/OpenCL-Benchmark
Can additional GPU computing power test modes be added?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 331
- Forks
- 37
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Peak FP32 TFLOPS (non-Tensor)
Peak FP16 TFLOPS (non-Tensor)
Peak BF16 TFLOPS (non-Tensor)
Peak INT32 TOPS (non-Tensor)
RT TFLOPS
Peak FP8 Tensor TFLOPS with FP16 Accumulate
Peak FP8 Tensor TFLOPS with FP32 Accumulate
Peak FP16 Tensor TFLOPS with FP16 Accumulate
Peak FP16 Tensor TFLOPS with FP32 Accumulate
Peak TF32 Tensor TFLOPS
Peak INT8 Tensor TOPS
Peak INT4 Tensor TOPS
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files or tests; start by locating the benchmark's existing GPU test modes and how their results are reported. Add the requested FP32, FP16, BF16, INT32, RT, FP8, TF32, INT8, and INT4 measurements, then verify that each requested mode produces a result across supported hardware.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- hpc, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100