ProjectPhysX / ProjectPhysX/FluidX3D
Question: Mesa RustiCL Driver full support of FluidX3D?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 5.3k
- Forks
- 472
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I see no information in readme.md about Mesa and his OpenCL.
There was great progress at RustiCL in last 2 years.
RustiCL supports openCL 3.0 and some extras dependent by hardware.
Rust does have advantages to memory leaks.
Language Rust: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust and https://rust-lang.org/
Perhaps some limitations,errors or bugs are solved in Relation to other implementations.
Or something should be extended or improved to support better FluidX3D.
See actual https://mesamatrix.net/
So my question to author, users and programmers here:
Which rustiCL drivers do not run, run basic or good or excellent with this great program FluidX3D?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing readme.md and the Mesa/RustiCL information referenced in the issue. No source files, tests, or concrete change are named; the scope would first need to define which RustiCL drivers and FluidX3D capabilities to evaluate and what support outcome counts as done.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- hpc
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100