Predictify-org / Predictify-org/predictify-contracts
[GrantFox][Medium] Stabilize public error mapping
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 312
- Avg merge
- 12h 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 19
Description
Summary
Stabilize public error mapping
Why this matters
Client applications need consistent decoding when contract errors evolve.
Scope
Version public error codes and preserve compatibility for existing callers.
Acceptance criteria
- Existing codes remain stable.
- New codes are unique and documented.
- Unknown values decode safely.
- Golden vectors cover public entrypoints.
Validation
Add regression coverage for existing behavior, failure modes, authorization boundaries, and compatibility. The implementation must pass the repository CI checks.
Non-goals
- Typo-only, formatting-only, or documentation-only changes.
- Unrelated refactors or dependency upgrades.
- Weakening existing security, authorization, CI, or production safeguards.
Contributor application
Before implementation, comment with relevant experience, a 1–4 bullet approach, and an estimate for opening the first draft PR. Wait for maintainer assignment before coding.
PR requirements
Use a feature branch, include Closes #<issue-number>, check every acceptance criterion, link criteria to code/tests, explain security and failure-mode considerations, and pass CI.
Reward-readiness
This is a substantive GrantFox campaign issue. Merge and CI success do not by themselves guarantee reward eligibility; final reward-readiness is determined by campaign review.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the public error definitions, decoding entrypoints, and existing compatibility or golden-vector tests in the repository. Review how current codes and authorization failure modes are represented, then use the acceptance criteria and repository CI checks to verify stable codes, unique documented additions, safe unknown-value handling, and coverage of public entrypoints.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100