Proactive PR checks + better UX representation
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
feature/desktop
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 39.9k
- Forks
- 3.4k
- Avg merge
- 6h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 232
Description
https://discord.com/channels/1465397904901673123/1523746682301317270
- we need better PR checks
- dropdown for checks/failures/comments and how the agent can address them (or not)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked Discord discussion, since the issue names no repository files, tests, or entry points. Clarify the desired PR checks, the dropdown states, and how agent responses should be represented before identifying the implementation area and acceptance criteria.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100