QA test section
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 39.9k
- Forks
- 3.4k
- Avg merge
- 6h 51m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 232
Description
Feature request
Is your feature request related to a problem?
Today, if a user wants to add specific users into an experiment, they can do that by an email match. This enables a level of QA
Describe the solution you'd like
Other platforms allow you to add QA testers as a section itself
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
Debug info
- [ ] PostHog Cloud, Debug information: [please copy/paste from https://us.posthog.com/settings/project-details#variables]
- [ ] PostHog Hobby self-hosted with `docker compose`, version/commit: [please provide]
- [ ] PostHog self-hosted with Kubernetes (deprecated, see [`Sunsetting Kubernetes support`](https://posthog.com/blog/sunsetting-helm-support-posthog)), version/commit: [please provide]
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not identify files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the experiment audience and email-match implementation, then define how a separate QA-tester section should work; done means users can add and manage QA testers as a distinct experiment audience.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- analytics
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100