PolicyEngine / PolicyEngine/policyengine-uk
Report WAS RF model quality on a holdout set
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 50
- Forks
- 33
- Avg merge
- 20h 58m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Description
This issue has no description.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names a WAS RF model and a holdout set but provides no files, tests, or implementation details. Start by locating the WAS RF model and any existing model-quality reporting or holdout evaluation entry points. Done means the model's quality is reported on a holdout set.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100