PolicyEngine / PolicyEngine/policyengine-taxsim
IA married/combined 2021 58page 57sage 104Kpwages 44pensions 14Kintrec
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 17
- Forks
- 10
- Avg merge
- 15h 55m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
See http://taxsim.nber.org/out2psl/1110
PE and TA disagree on AGI, perhaps pension exclusion depends differently on age of taxpayers? We told TA the pension was eligible for exclusion in spite of young age of taxpayers.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the TAXSIM output at http://taxsim.nber.org/out2psl/1110 and trace the corresponding married 2021 case in the Python project. Compare PolicyEngine and TAXSIM AGI results, focusing on the pension exclusion and taxpayer ages; done means the discrepancy is explained and the case produces the expected result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- fintech-quant
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100