PolicyEngine / PolicyEngine/policyengine-app-v2
Blog post: South Carolina H.3492 EITC refundability reform
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 1d 50m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 39
Description
Summary
Create a blog post covering South Carolina H.3492, which modifies the state's existing 125% nonrefundable EITC match to make 25% of the excess credit refundable.
Bill details
SC H.3492 modifies the state's existing 125% nonrefundable EITC match. Currently, the credit is entirely nonrefundable, meaning low-income filers with little/no state tax liability lose most of the benefit. The bill makes 25% of the excess credit (the portion exceeding tax liability) refundable.
PolicyEngine analysis (tax year 2026)
- Cost: $403 million
- Benefits: 23.3% of South Carolina residents
- Poverty reduction: 2.1% overall
- Child poverty reduction: 4.8%
- Gains concentrated in bottom half of income distribution
Key policy insight
The $403M cost reflects that most current EITC recipients have near-zero SC tax liability, so the existing 125% nonrefundable match provides very little actual benefit. This bill effectively unlocks that dead credit value—25% of 125% = 31.25% of federal EITC (~$406M, matching our estimate).
Structure
Follow the structure of utah-sb60-income-tax-reduction.md:
- Introduction with bill context
- Key results summary
- Link to PolicyEngine reform
- Policy explanation section
- Household impacts section
- Statewide impacts section (with distributional analysis)
- Conclusion
Files to create/modify
- Create
app/src/data/posts/articles/sc-h3492-eitc-refundability.md - Add entry to
app/src/data/posts/posts.json - Add image (placeholder or relevant stock image)
Notes
- Include placeholder for PolicyEngine app reform link
- Emphasize the "unlocking dead credit value" insight
- Use sentence case for all headings per CLAUDE.md guidelines
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read utah-sb60-income-tax-reduction.md and the sentence-case guidance in CLAUDE.md before creating app/src/data/posts/articles/sc-h3492-eitc-refundability.md. Add the post entry to app/src/data/posts/posts.json and an image, covering the supplied bill details, results, reform-link placeholder, household and statewide impacts, and the dead-credit insight.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- Half a day
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100