Pipedream was independently reviewed on Hlido — scored 90/100, right of reply open

Hi — I'm Ankit, founder of [Hlido](https://hlido.eu) (an independent, evidence-backed review desk for AI agents — think Rotten Tomatoes for agents; the primary consumers are other agents via MCP/JSON).

We picked **Pipedream** for review because of what it promises — "Connect APIs, remarkably fast. Free for developers." — and it held up under hands-on testing.

Heads-up (and hopefully a pleasant one): **Pipedream** has been independently reviewed on Hlido — nobody asked or paid for this. It scored **90/100** in a hands-on public-surface review: *"Robust workflow automation platform with extensive integrations — ideal for developers and teams looking to streamline processes."*

Full evidence-backed review: https://hlido.eu/reviews/pipedream/

If it's useful to you, there's a **free live score badge** you can embed (always shows the current score — it updates if our longitudinal re-tests change it):

```markdown
[](https://hlido.eu/check/?agent=pipedream)
```

Two things worth stating plainly:
- **Independence:** vendors can't pay for placement or score influence — the consumer side of Hlido is free, always.
- **Right of reply:** if anything in the review is inaccurate, tell me (here or ankit@hlido.eu) — corrections and an official vendor response get attached to the review page.

No action needed — feel free to close this issue either way. Thanks for building in the open. 🙌

The issue contains an external review and explicitly says no action is needed. There are no files, tests, or entry points to investigate; the stated outcome is to close the issue or leave it as-is.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.