PennyLaneAI / PennyLaneAI/catalyst
Missing reactive PPM handling during PBC depth analysis
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 234
- Forks
- 84
- Avg merge
- 2d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 66
Description
This issue has no description.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue body names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating the PBC depth analysis implementation and existing PPM handling, then identify the relevant test coverage; done means reactive PPM cases are handled during that analysis without regressions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100