OpenSourceOrg / OpenSourceOrg/dotOrg
opensource.org/licenses-old/category is a little weird
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- PHP
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 6
- Avg merge
- 13h 26m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Description
- Many license names listed match neither the OSI nor the SPDX name
- for instance "2-clause BSD license"
- Some license names are not followed by its SPDX identifier, even though one exists
- for instance "CeCILL License 2.1"
- In the category "Other/Miscellaneous licenses" the 0BSD is listed thrice
- 0-clause BSD License (0BSD)
- Free Public License 1.0.0 (0BSD)
- Zero-Clause BSD (0BSD)
- Not all licenses from opensource.org/licenses are listed
- for instance the BlueOak-1.0.0
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the opensource.org/licenses-old/category page referenced by the issue and compare its license names, SPDX identifiers, duplicates, and coverage with opensource.org/licenses. Update the category listing so names and identifiers are consistent, 0BSD appears once, and missing licenses such as BlueOak-1.0.0 are included. Confirm the rendered page reflects all four requested corrections.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- php
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100