OpenRefine / OpenRefine/openrefine.org
[Feature] : Documentation Feedback Widget
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 161
- Forks
- 142
- Avg merge
- 6h 10m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Problem
Documentation is only as good as its maintenance. Currently, there is no direct way for a user to signal that a specific page is outdated, unclear, or broken, other than opening a GitHub issue (which has high friction).
Proposed Solution
Implement a "Was this page helpful?" feedback widget at the bottom of every documentation page.
Key Features
-
Simple Binary Feedback:
- "👍 Yes" / "👎 No" buttons at the bottom of the docs layout.
-
Optional Context:
- If "No" is clicked, optionally expand a small text area asking "What went wrong?" (e.g., "Outdated", "Confusing", "Example didn't work").
-
Analytics Integration:
- Send this event data to the existing analytics provider (Google Analytics or similar, if configured) or log it to a service like Netlify Forms (since the site is hosted on Netlify).
-
GitHub Issue Link:
- Provide a "Report an issue on GitHub" link next to the feedback widget for more detailed bug reports.
Technical Feasibility
- Implementation: Docusaurus
Swizzlefeature can be used to wrap theDocItemcomponent or append to theDocItemFooter. - Backend: Netlify Forms is a great zero-config backend for this since
netlify.tomlis present in the repo. - Scope: ~2 weeks.
- Week 1: Swizzle
DocItemFootercomponent and build UI. - Week 2: Integrate with Netlify Forms or Analytics API and style it to match the theme.
- Week 1: Swizzle
Value
Provides a passive, low-friction channel for improving documentation quality, essential for complex tools like OpenRefine.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the Docusaurus DocItemFooter swizzle entry point and reading netlify.toml. Check whether an analytics provider is configured before deciding between analytics and Netlify Forms. Done means every documentation page has the binary feedback UI, optional context for negative feedback, and a GitHub issue link with the chosen submission path working.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- documentation, frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100