OpenMOSS / OpenMOSS/SWE-bench-Science
Plan to open-source data generation code & clarification around "expert-exploratory"
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 80
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, congrats on the benchmark release!
I wonder if there's a plan to open-source your GitHub task-mining/discovery pipeline?
Specifically, your paper mentions “expert-exploratory” tasks - I wonder if these "experts" are just LLMs, or actual human experts?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the benchmark release and the paper's discussion of the GitHub task-mining/discovery pipeline and “expert-exploratory” tasks. Done means documenting whether the data-generation code will be open-sourced and clarifying whether the experts are LLMs or human experts; the issue names no files or tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100