OpenMOSS / OpenMOSS/MOVA

Failed to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench

Open
#40 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.1k
Forks
93
Avg merge
1m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

Hi,

I tried to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench, but ran into some issues. I followed the instructions in Verse-Bench (Hugging Face dataset) and Verse-Bench (GitHub repo) to prepare the test data and run the evaluation. For video inference, I used the same settings as the office code demo.

However, my average LSE-C is 5.41 and the average LSE-D is 13.303, which are much worse than the numbers reported in the paper. When I visualized the generated videos, they didn’t look obviously strange.

I uploaded the first two inference results from set3 here:
Google Drive link

In my tests:

  • For case0: LSE-C = 4.4768114, LSE-D = 12.80221240751205
  • For case-1: LSE-C = 6.9611187, LSE-D = 13.244998070501513

I’m not sure what might be causing this discrepancy.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the Verse-Bench Hugging Face dataset, GitHub repository, and the office code demo settings used for video inference. Compare the preparation, inference, and LSE-C/LSE-D evaluation steps against the reported paper results and the uploaded set3 cases; done means identifying the source of the discrepancy or explaining why the reported metrics cannot be reproduced.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
huggingface, python
Domain
machine-learning, testing-qa
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.