Failed to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 93
- Avg merge
- 1m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hi,
I tried to reproduce mova-360p’s LSE-C and LSE-D metrics on Verse-Bench, but ran into some issues. I followed the instructions in Verse-Bench (Hugging Face dataset) and Verse-Bench (GitHub repo) to prepare the test data and run the evaluation. For video inference, I used the same settings as the office code demo.
However, my average LSE-C is 5.41 and the average LSE-D is 13.303, which are much worse than the numbers reported in the paper. When I visualized the generated videos, they didn’t look obviously strange.
I uploaded the first two inference results from set3 here:
Google Drive link
In my tests:
- For case0: LSE-C = 4.4768114, LSE-D = 12.80221240751205
- For case-1: LSE-C = 6.9611187, LSE-D = 13.244998070501513
I’m not sure what might be causing this discrepancy.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the Verse-Bench Hugging Face dataset, GitHub repository, and the office code demo settings used for video inference. Compare the preparation, inference, and LSE-C/LSE-D evaluation steps against the reported paper results and the uploaded set3 cases; done means identifying the source of the discrepancy or explaining why the reported metrics cannot be reproduced.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- huggingface, python
- Domain
- machine-learning, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100