About seed-tts performance
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.4k
- Forks
- 138
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi, thanks for this great work.
I tried to evaluate the released Moss-TTSD-v0.5 on seed-tts, but only got 9.81 WER and 3.74 CER, which is much higher than the reported 1.99 / 1.56. Does this performance come from the released Moss-TTSD-v0.5 model?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names the seed-tts evaluation and released Moss-TTSD-v0.5 model, but no files, entry points, or tests. Start by locating the repository's seed-tts evaluation path and rerunning it with the released model; done means determining whether the reported WER/CER can be reproduced and documenting the result.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100