OpenLogicProject / OpenLogicProject/OpenLogic

Seven localized source corrections found during translation QA

Open
#435 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TeX
Stars
1.4k
Forks
288
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hello — while checking complete translation targets against the English source, I found seven small, high-confidence source defects. I verified each against current master at 1e960beff9ed7835bf3e3f1335e21af3439cd107 as well as the frozen translation authority 9620cc7.

This list deliberately excludes everything already raised in #432, #433, or the findings ledger linked from #432.

  1. content/proof-theory/proof-search/tableaux.tex:29
    shows that would show thatwould show that (or simply shows that).

  2. content/second-order-logic/metatheory/second-order-arithmetic.tex:41–42
    \Domain{M})$.\Domain{M}$). The parenthesis belongs to the surrounding “i.e.” clause, not inside the formula.

  3. content/second-order-logic/metatheory/undecidability-and-axiomatizability.tex:33
    $\Sat{M}{!P \lif !A$}.$\Sat{M}{!P \lif !A}$. This closes the second argument of \Sat before math mode ends.

  4. content/set-theory/ord-arithmetic/using-addition.tex:61
    Insert the missing =: $\setrank{A \times B} = \max(\setrank{A}, \setrank{B}) \ordplus 2$.

  5. content/first-order-logic/tableaux/provability-consistency.tex:122
    On the left left sideOn the left side.

  6. content/sets-functions-relations/size-of-sets/non-enumerability-alt.tex:135
    iff ififf.

  7. content/proof-theory/sequent-calculus/invertibility.tex:331,366,372
    At line 331, \RightR{\lexists}\RightR{\lforall}, since the displayed principal formula is universal. At lines 366 and 372, !B!B(t), matching the existential-rule premise at line 360.

These are source-quality notes for maintainer review; no upstream endorsement of any translation is implied.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reviewing the seven cited .tex files and line ranges against master commit 1e960beff9ed7835bf3e3f1335e21af3439cd107 and translation authority 9620cc7. Check each listed wording, punctuation, formula, and notation correction, while confirming the findings are not covered by #432, #433, or its ledger. Done means all seven source-quality findings have been reviewed and addressed or dispositioned by the maintainer.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
latex, tex
Domain
content, documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.