OpenGVLab / OpenGVLab/InternVideo

Request for Official MVBench Evaluation Protocol for InternVideo2_5_Chat_8B

Open
#310 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
2.4k
Forks
160
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi OpenGVLab Team,

Thank you for releasing InternVideo2.5.

I am trying to reproduce the official MVBench score of 75.7 reported for OpenGVLab/InternVideo2_5_Chat_8B.
I am using the HuggingFace reference implementation as a starting point:

https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/InternVideo2_5_Chat_8B#%F0%9F%9A%80-how-to-use-the-model

To ensure my evaluation matches yours, I would appreciate clarification on the exact protocol, including:

  • the number of frames and the frame-sampling strategy,
  • preprocessing details (input resolution, dynamic tiling, thumbnail usage),
  • the prompt template used for multiple-choice questions,
  • decoding settings and the rule for extracting the predicted option.

Most importantly, could you share the official evaluation script or configuration used to obtain the reported 75.7 score?
If available, reference evaluation settings for other datasets (LongVideoBench, VideoMME, EgoSchema, Perception Test, LVBench) would also be very helpful.

Thank you in advance!

~Sergey

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked Hugging Face reference implementation for OpenGVLab/InternVideo2_5_Chat_8B and compare it with the reported MVBench score of 75.7. Done would be a documented official evaluation script or configuration covering frame sampling, preprocessing, prompts, decoding, and option extraction, with settings for the named datasets where available.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
computer-vision, machine-learning, testing-qa
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.