OpenFreeEnergy / OpenFreeEnergy/openfe

improve Warehouse validation

Open
#2,162 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
331
Forks
56
Avg merge
3d 9h
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Description

Just food for thought, does not block... If a warehouse is partially corrupted, does this work? For example, if the default is exist_ok is False, what happens when someone accidentally deletes a single store, is the convention to just recreate the whole store? Is this worth caring about?

Originally posted by @ethanholz in https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/openfe/pull/2155#discussion_r3824730495

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the warehouse validation and checking the exist_ok=False path when a single store is missing. Clarify whether a partially corrupted warehouse should recreate only the missing store or the whole store, then define the expected behavior before changing it.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.