OpenFn / OpenFn/kit

Consider using bun or ava CLI for integration tests

Open
#1,329 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

CLI DevX
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
21
Forks
23
Avg merge
1d 22h
Merged PRs (30d)
17

Description

We've had a history of difficulty running the integration tests in different node versions because of changing loader support (because of typescript)

What if we made the integration tests use bun, which is TS native? That might simplify the integration tests.

Does it complicate things locally? I should still be able to use pnpm locally on a sensible version - it's just the CLI action I want to simplify

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the integration-test configuration and the CLI action that runs those tests. Compare whether Bun or Ava can provide the requested TypeScript and Node-version simplification while keeping local pnpm usage sensible; done means the integration tests run reliably in the CLI workflow and the local workflow remains usable.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
bun, typescript
Domain
ci-cd, testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.