OpenDevicePartnership / OpenDevicePartnership/odp-platform-common
Prepare the patina_boot upstream RFC re-proposal
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 3d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
Parent roadmap: #190
Goal
Re-propose patina_boot for upstream Patina acceptance using the completed readiness evidence and a deliberately bounded API and compatibility claim.
Deliverables
- revised RFC separating generic boot mechanism from platform and OEM policy
- explicit supported-semantic contract linked to #196 and its implementation
- security model linked to #191-#194
- portability evidence linked to #118 and #158
- reproducible performance appendix linked to #108 and #195
- migration and compatibility notes for existing Patina consumers
Acceptance criteria
- every compatibility, security, and performance claim links to reproducible evidence
- unresolved gaps are listed rather than implied complete
- the upstream ask excludes Maa-specific policy
- maintainer feedback from the previous RFC is mapped to a resolution or explicit design decision
- the RFC is submitted only after the upstream-ready definition in #190 is satisfied
Dependencies
- Blocked by #191-#196, #118, and #158
- #114 consumes the accepted upstream positioning for the separate OEM package
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the parent roadmap in #190 and confirm its upstream-ready definition before reviewing the blocked issues #191-#196, #118, and #158. Use their completed evidence and the previous RFC feedback to assemble the bounded proposal. Done means every claim links to reproducible evidence, gaps and design decisions are explicit, Maa-specific policy is excluded, and the upstream ask is submitted only after #190 is satisfied.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100