希望支持其他LLM大模型的API调用
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 8.5k
- Forks
- 905
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Feature Description / 功能描述
Please describe the feature you would like to see added or improved. / 请描述您希望添加或改进的功能。
Goal / 目标
Explain the goal you hope to achieve with this feature. / 请说明您希望通过这个功能实现的目标。
Expected Behavior / 预期行为
Describe the behavior you expect from this feature. / 请描述您期望的功能行为。
Alternative Solutions / 其他解决方案
If you have considered any alternative solutions, please provide them here. / 如果您已经考虑了其他解决方案，请在此处提供。
Additional Notes / 其他备注
If you have any additional information or notes, please add them here. / 如果有其他补充信息，请在此处添加。
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue body is an unfilled feature template and names no files, tests, or entry points. First clarify which LLM providers and API behavior should be supported, then locate the existing model-integration entry point. Done should include an agreed provider scope and documented, tested support for the requested APIs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- ai, api
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100