OpenBMB / OpenBMB/SimpleMemVLA

Verify evals on Papers with Code

Open
#1 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
59
Forks
6
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Hi,

Niels here from the open-source team at Hugging Face. Congratulations on your work!

I've made the paper and 7 paper-native evaluations available on Papers with Code.

The paper is part of the Robotics task page.

The SimpleMemVLA result currently ranks third on RMBench.

Would it be possible to verify these results and let me know if any score, model name, benchmark protocol, or openness metadata should be corrected? The imported rows are tied to the paper or its official release artifacts; comparison-table baselines were not added.

You can also edit the task, methods, project page, and GitHub URL directly from the paper page using your Hugging Face account.

If you'd like to showcase the results in your repository README, you can copy these live leaderboard badges (or use the “Copy PwC badge” button in the Results section):

Papers with Code: #3 on RMBench

Feel free to copy the badges in your README, as this would help the visibility of my website.

Kind regards,

Niels

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked Papers with Code paper, its seven paper-native evaluations, and the official release artifacts. Verify each score, model name, benchmark protocol, and openness metadata; done means any discrepancies are identified and reported or corrected, but no repository file or test is named.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
huggingface
Domain
documentation, machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.