Request official evaluation scripts/configs for reproducing MiniCPM5-2B benchmark results
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 11.1k
- Forks
- 763
- Avg merge
- 6h 3m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Hello MiniCPM Team,
I am trying to reproduce the benchmark results of MiniCPM5-2B for academic research.
I have successfully deployed the released MiniCPM5-2B model following the official instructions. However, I could not find the complete evaluation pipeline used to obtain the benchmark results reported in the model card.
Could you please share the official evaluation scripts and configurations, including:
- Benchmark evaluation scripts (MATH-500, MMLU/MMLU-Pro, AIME, HMMT, etc.);
- Inference settings:
- prompt/chat template;
- whether
enable_thinking=Trueis used; - generation parameters (
max_new_tokens, temperature, top_p, do_sample, stop criteria, etc.);
- Answer extraction and grading scripts;
- Dataset preprocessing and evaluation commands.
I especially want to reproduce the reported MATH-500 score (94.6), and I would like to confirm whether the official evaluation uses any reasoning budget, length control, or special stopping strategy for the thinking mode.
Any scripts or configuration files would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named in the issue. Start by locating any existing evaluation or benchmark-related material in the repository, then determine whether the requested MATH-500, MMLU/MMLU-Pro, AIME, and HMMT scripts, configurations, preprocessing, and grading commands can be added; done means the official reproduction workflow is available and documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100