OpenAPITools / OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
[REQ][Ruby] Use `::API/Model` namespace instead of `Api` suffix
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 26.8k
- Forks
- 7.7k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In large project there is a chance of having a name collision between API name and model name.
Describe the solution you'd like
Move API definitions to namespace ProjectName::API:: and models to ProjectName::Model::.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I do not know any.
Additional context
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the Ruby generator and its API/model naming templates, then determine how namespace configuration is applied across generated clients. Done means generated Ruby APIs use the ProjectName::API namespace and models use ProjectName::Model without the Api suffix, with relevant generation tests passing.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 15/100