OpenAPITools / OpenAPITools/openapi-generator

Unable to migrate from swagger-codegen due to removed method in CodegenModelFactory

Open
#7,452 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Java
Stars
26.8k
Forks
7.7k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Description

I'm currently migrating from swagger-codegen 2.3.1 to openapi-generator 4.3.1 and I came into a big problem. We have a highly customized generator and templates, and I'm currently stuck on a method that was removed with https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/pull/1744. We use this to add more fields into Operations and Properties so that they can be used on the mustache templates.
How can I overcome this drawback?

public class MyJavaJerseyServerCodegen extends JavaJerseyServerCodegen
{
...
   public void processOpts(){
      ...
      CodegenModelFactory.setTypeMapping(CodegenModelType.OPERATION, MyCodegenOperation.class);
      CodegenModelFactory.setTypeMapping(CodegenModelType.PROPERTY, MyCodegenProperty.class);
      ...
   }
...
}

public class MyCodegenOperation extends CodegenOperation {
  public String entryPointResponseModel;
  public boolean supportError501;
  ...
  public boolean hasNonCookieHeaders;
  public boolean hasHeaders;

  public MyCodegenOperation()
  {
    super();
  }
}
openapi-generator version

4.3.1

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading CodegenModelFactory and the change linked as pull request 1744, then inspect JavaJerseyServerCodegen, CodegenOperation, and the custom CodegenModel mappings shown in the issue. Determine a supported replacement for extending operations and properties in version 4.3.1, and document or test how custom fields remain available to the mustache templates.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java, openapi
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.