OpenAPITools / OpenAPITools/openapi-generator
[REQ] Improve protobuf generator by adding custom options for api and model files
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 26.8k
- Forks
- 7.7k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Our project requires custom options in the proto api and model files.
Describe the solution you'd like
Can define 2 new options in the protobuf generator:
- customOptionsApi
- customOptionsModel
https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/pull/21075
Describe alternatives you've considered
n/a
Additional context
Some good options that you can provide include:
- option cc_generic_services = true; # C++
- option optimize_for = SPEED;
java options see here
- option java_multiple_files = true;
- option java_package = "com.example.tutorial.protos.api";
- option java_outer_classname = "ExampleProtos";
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing linked pull request #21075 and the protobuf generator entry point. Trace how API and model .proto files are produced, then verify that customOptionsApi and customOptionsModel can supply options such as the examples in the issue. Done means generated API and model files include the configured custom options.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100