OneLiteFeatherNET / OneLiteFeatherNET/Labyrinth
Security audit: review plugin code and repo hardening
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
type:audit
type:repo-health
type:security
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 1d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 6
Description
User story
As a project owner, I want a security review of the Bukkit plugin code and repository configuration so that risks are identified and mitigated before release.
Scope
- Commands, listeners, and services (input validation, permissions, config access)
- Configuration handling (
config.ymland zone keys) - Build and CI workflows (supply-chain and release safety)
- Dependency versions and update practices
Acceptance criteria
- Validate all user input and zone identifiers consistently.
- Confirm permissions are enforced for all commands.
- Identify any unsafe reflection, dynamic loading, or unsafe config access patterns.
- Document findings and recommended fixes.
- Update documentation if workflow or security guidance changes.
Estimate
- Planning-poker: S (2 points)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the commands, listeners, services, config.yml and zone keys, then inspect the build and CI workflows and dependency update practices. Check input validation, permissions, reflection or dynamic loading, and config access; done means findings and recommended fixes are documented and any changed security guidance is updated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- ci-cd, game-dev, security
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100