OWASP / OWASP/quantum-security-project
Proposal: PQC Protocol Readiness Matrix
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 99
- Forks
- 32
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Create and maintain an OWASP PQC Protocol Readiness Matrix that evaluates the post-quantum readiness of application and security protocols such as TLS, SSH, IPsec/IKEv2, QUIC, DTLS, MQTT, PKI/X.509, DNSSEC, and signing protocols.
The matrix would track whether each protocol has a defined migration path to PQC, including standardization, hybrid support, implementation availability, interoperability, and operational considerations.
PR #41 focuses on cryptographic inventory management and PQ-readiness software. Its primary question is:
What cryptographic assets and algorithms does an organization have, and how can they manage their migration?
This proposal focuses on the protocol layer:
How ready are the protocols that applications depend on for PQC adoption?
Expected Outcome
The project would maintain a living, evidence-backed reference matrix showing the current PQC readiness of protocols and their surrounding ecosystem.
The matrix would be based on standards, implementation evidence, interoperability testing, and publicly verifiable sources rather than subjective vendor rankings.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the issue's listed protocols and its criteria: standardization, hybrid support, implementation availability, interoperability, and operations. Review the cited PR #41 for the boundary between protocol readiness and cryptographic inventory work. Done means a living, evidence-backed matrix covering the proposed protocol scope with publicly verifiable sources.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- cryptography, documentation, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100