Curriculum Module Format Standardization
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 40
- Forks
- 16
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Description
Looking at the existing content, I think it is necessary to define a well-structured template and set of requirements for each module to follow. This standardization would make modules easy to contribute to and evaluate for completeness.
@Shruti-s-kulkarni Does something like the following work?
Title / ID
Description and Scope
Key Concepts and Terminology
Core Content
Topic 1
Topic 2
...
Resources
References
Labs and Exercises
...
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the existing module content and compare its structure with the proposed Title/ID, Description and Scope, concepts, core content, and resources sections. Define the required template and completeness criteria, then document the agreed standard so contributors and evaluators can apply it consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100