Include principle direction to maintain Design Integrity
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 14
- Forks
- 7
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Issues can arise when design is not followed through on. This is more than completion. This is accuracy and fidelity to the original design and architecture. there needs to be a concise definition to hang references on.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no file, test, or entry point. Start by reviewing the repository documentation and existing references to design integrity, then identify where a concise principle definition belongs. Done means the project has an agreed definition that explains accuracy and fidelity to the original design and architecture.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- design, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100