ORNL / ORNL/cpp-proposals-pub

Add justification for `atomic_ref<T>` instead of `atomic<T&>` to P0019

Open
#26 1 comment 0 reactions 2 assignees View on GitHub

@dsunder is already working on this.

Since May 5, 2018.

Dominant language
HTML
Stars
29
Forks
26
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Per Jens' comment:

I’m still not seeing a discussion (in the “motivation” section or similar) why std::atomic<T&> can’t be made to work and why rewriting the specification of std::atomic<> in terms of std::atomic_ref<> was not performed. This seems crucial information for posterity.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.