Make PhasorDynamics models Hessenberg-ready
@lukelowry is already working on this.
Since Jun 25, 2026.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 27
- Forks
- 11
- Avg merge
- 3d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 23
Description
Summary
Track PhasorDynamics models whose state equations are not in explicit derivative form, especially parameter-switched cases where a state can become algebraic.
Rationale
In #439, IEEET1 supports $T_R = 0$ by retagging $V_{ts}$ as algebraic. That works for fully implicit DAE residuals, but can block future Hessenberg-form solvers that need separate differential right-hand-side and algebraic residual methods.
Description
Define a convention for these parametrically piecewise models, then update each affected model so it has a Hessenberg-compatible representation.
Models to cover:
Additional information
Any changes would be mostly mechanical tasks; unclear what the final desired algebraic/differential variant implementation looks like at this time.
We also need to determine:
- how to document conditionally algebraic states/equations
- how to reduce the count of duplicate equations if we have multiple variations of each model
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.