OCHA-DAP / OCHA-DAP/ds-knowledge-base

[kb] Verify funding/scope in 4 frameworks whose published PDFs contradict themselves

Open
#5 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

kb-feedback
Dominant language
HTML
Stars
2
Forks
1
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
66

Description

Ingestion (batch 2) found PDF-internal inconsistencies in four published framework docs. The KB pages recorded the headline value and flagged the conflict, but a framework owner should confirm which figure is authoritative (the published doc itself disagrees, so this isn't a KB transcription error):

framework inconsistency in the published PDF
bfa-flooding Financement releases funds 'conformément aux scénarios 3, 4 et 5' but the plan defines only 4 scenarios; Scenario 4 says both '72 heures' and 'sous 48 heures'; region count given as 5 / 6 / 7 across the doc.
bgd-flooding Headline 'up to $6M from CERF' but the financing-overview annex table sums to a different figure.
ner-flooding Financement states a $5,000,000 CERF envelope, but Tableau 1 sums to a different total.
sahel-drought Doc date 2022-09-29 (filename) vs '17 Octobre' (body); repo iri_historical.md encodes a BFA threshold (prob=40, frac=0.1) differing from the PDF.

Each is a [conflict] discrepancy on the respective KB page (currently in PR #2). Recorded values are the headline ones; please confirm or correct. Surfaced by the KB ingestion audit (automated + Opus-reviewed).

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review the four published framework PDFs, the corresponding [conflict] entries on the KB pages, and iri_historical.md for the sahel-drought threshold. Confirm each disputed figure or date with the relevant framework owner, then correct the recorded headline values and conflict notes in the work currently associated with PR #2.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
28/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.