Advice regarding alternatives to the `with attrset;` antipattern doesn't apply in general.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Nix
- Stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 339
- Avg merge
- 2d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
The advice in this section doesn't apply if the list elements are nested attribute sets (i.e., they have dots) or are function applications (i.e., they are surrounded by parentheses). Maybe other alternatives in these cases should also be provided?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked with attrset section in the language anti-patterns documentation and review its current advice against nested attribute sets and function applications. Done means the guidance covers these cases and provides suitable alternatives where the existing recommendations do not apply.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100