License vs. Terms of Use

Page URL

https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/storagegrid/s3/consistency.html

Page title

How StorageGRID S3 REST API balances availability and consistency

Summary

• At the bottom, there's a link to Terms of Use
• That links to netapp.com
• There, it says:

Unless otherwise specified in these Terms, all information and screens appearing on this Site, including documents, services, site design, text, graphics, logos, images and icons, as well as the arrangement thereof, are the sole property of NetApp. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.

Since these NetAppDocs repositories have no license in them, what rights are expressly or implicitly granted?

This repo claims the documentation is open-source.

Questions/issues:

• which open-source license are NetApp docs (including this repo) made available under, so that users may know what rights are "expressly granted" and avoid violating the NetApp Terms of Use?
• shouldn't there be a license file in each repo? For "open-source" documentation, it is common to use one of the CC licenses.

Public issues must not contain sensitive information

• This issue contains no sensitive information.

Start by reviewing the repository and the linked NetApp Terms of Use and documentation page. Determine which licensing information the repository provides and what change is requested for users to understand their rights. Done means the applicable license position is resolved and documented, including whether each repository needs a license file.