NatLabRockies / NatLabRockies/SAM

Rate switching not available for Residential and Commercial financial models

Open
#301 2 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@sjanzou is already working on this.

Since Aug 5, 2020.

utility rate wishlist
Dominant language
C++
Stars
486
Forks
219
Avg merge
10h 10m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

Electricity bill calculations calculate bill savings by subtracting a "with system" bill from a "without system" bill. Both bills are calculated using the same rate structure. In rate switching the "with system" bill uses a different rate structure than the "without system" bill. For example, a residence might pay energy charges based on a flat rate, but qualify for TOU rates after a PV system is installed.

The Value of RE macro calculates the electricity bill and NPV for a rate switching scenario, but several users have requested that rate switching be available with a regular simulation.

independent of CHP considerations, in SCE’s Service AREA, if one installs a significant enough battery system and or PV system, one can opt for a different version of TOU 8D. Last year, one could go to TOU8 R , and there were other rate switch options. Also, I approximated the Departing Load Charges, these CHP monthly charges I think are actually (Total Annual Generation/12 x the Departing Load Charge (about .0034/KWH).

This would require that the bill calculator have inputs for two rate schedules and that the user interface allow for two separate sets of electricity rate inputs.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.