NatLabRockies / NatLabRockies/SAM

Review default loss assumptions of PVWatts vs Detailed PV Model

Open
#120 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@janinefreeman is already working on this.

Since Oct 10, 2019.

enhancement pv
Dominant language
C++
Stars
486
Forks
219
Avg merge
10h 10m
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

We should consider reviewing the default loss assumptions for both PVWatts and the detailed PV model for consistency as appropriate (may not always be appropriate, depending on the loss). The soiling loss is a good example of this need.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.