NatLabRockies / NatLabRockies/H2Integrate
Consider using WOMBAT's degradation
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 26
- Forks
- 44
- Avg merge
- 3d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
Maybe something to make an issue about but I think we would/could be getting the degradation from WOMBAT rather than the native H2I electrolyzer degradation modeling but not sure about this.
Originally posted by @kbrunik in https://github.com/NREL/H2Integrate/pull/168#discussion_r2175774095
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare WOMBAT's degradation behavior with the native H2I electrolyzer degradation modeling and identify the relevant model entry points. The issue does not name files or tests; the work is complete when the preferred source of degradation is decided, implemented, and covered by appropriate tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100