NYCPlanning / NYCPlanning/data-engineering
review records in `nycourts_courts`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 43
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 23h 3m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 44
Description
nycourts_courts is only used in FacDB
we manually maintain the records in nycourts_courts by reviewing this site and making changes if we see any. we haven't made changes since 2021 and I don't see any new details for the records we currently have
but these records seem to be a subset of "courts" in NYC (e.g. no civil courts) and this site seems like a better resource for their addresses
what determines the types of courts we should have in FacDB?
the only other apparent dataset related to courts in FacDB is uscourts_courts
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the two linked NYC Courts sources and compare them with the existing nycourts_courts and uscourts_courts records in FacDB. Determine which court types and address source should be represented; done when the scope and any resulting record changes are agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100