BWoS LIFO vs BWoS FIFO
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 2.4k
- Forks
- 270
- Avg merge
- 3d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 39
Description
i am just wondering why the LIFO version of BWoS was implemented instead of the faster FIFO version descriped in the paper (figure 2a).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked paper, especially Figure 2a, and locate the BWoS implementation in the repository. Compare the current LIFO behavior with the paper's FIFO design; done should be a documented rationale for the choice or a clearly scoped decision about changing it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100