NVCF Control Plane Resiliency
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 218
- Forks
- 72
- Avg merge
- 1d 9h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 417
Description
Is this related to a problem? Please describe.
NVCF self-hosted runs one control plane, with every component as a single replica.
- One node failure is a full outage. Everything stops until the pod is rescheduled, which takes minutes.
- In-flight work is lost. Running invocations fail, and NVCA agents lose their connection to the control plane.
- The singleton services have no failover path — not the NATS JetStream leader, the OpenBao active node, or the Cassandra coordinator.
- There is no recovery contract. With no stated recovery time, an operator cannot commit to an SLA.
- Every upgrade needs downtime. A single-replica rollout cannot roll.
Describe the solution you'd like
Make one control plane survive failure within the cluster it runs on. Stateless services run as several replicas behind a load balancer, stateful services as clustered groups that keep working when a member is lost, and replicas are placed so no one failure can take them all. Covering:
- NVCF keeps serving through any failure inside the control plane, without operator intervention.
- No committed data is lost when something fails.
- Failover is invisible to users. They do not see errors while the platform recovers.
- Maintenance and upgrades do not require downtime.
- An operator can turn resilience on, and adjust it, through a single setting, without downtime or rebuilding an existing deployment.
- A recovery time is published per failure mode and met.
- The operator is warned when the platform can no longer absorb a failure.
- The supported topology, its infrastructure prerequisites, failure modes, and runbooks are published, and validated before release.
- LLM routing, streaming, and callback invocation paths survive component failure, with no dropped invocations.
Additional context
Related open issues: #41 (Support multi-region NVCF control planes), #44 (Support customer-managed infrastructure dependencies)
By submitting this issue, you agree to follow our code of conduct and our contributing guidelines.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by mapping the self-hosted control-plane deployment and reviewing related issues #41 and #44, then define supported replicas, failure modes, prerequisites, and runbooks. Done means the topology survives stated failures without operator intervention or data loss, supports downtime-free changes, and is validated before release.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cassandra, kubernetes
- Domain
- distributed-systems, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100