CAGRA -> HNSWLIB Poor Recall on Wiki Dataset
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Cuda
- Stars
- 854
- Forks
- 236
- Avg merge
- 3d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 62
Description
Dataset
97M wiki embeddings sourced from https://huggingface.co/datasets/Cohere/wikipedia-2023-11-embed-multilingual-v3-int8-binary
Query set: 10000 randomly sampled queries from this set (these were removed from the base training set)
Dataset shape
97M * 1024 int8 embeddings
Issue
With cuvs-bench, HNSWLIB recall goes to as high as 99% whereas CAGRA -> HNSWLIB the recall only gets up to 91%
cuvs-bench Index Params:
graph_build_algo: ["IVF_PQ"]
ivf_pq_build_kmeans_trainset_ratio: [10]
ivf_pq_build_pq_dim: [128]
ivf_pq_build_pq_bits: [8]
ivf_pq_search_n_probes: [2]
ivf_pq_search_refinement_rate: [1]
graph_degree: [32, 64, 96, 128]
intermediate_graph_degree: [32, 64, 96, 128]
hierarchy: ["cpu"]
ef_construction: [64, 128, 256, 512]
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the reported recall gap with cuvs-bench, the Wiki embeddings dataset, and the listed IVF_PQ, graph-degree, hierarchy, and ef-construction settings. Compare CAGRA -> HNSWLIB results with direct HNSWLIB results; done means identifying and correcting the cause of the recall difference or documenting a reproducible limitation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- machine-learning, performance, search
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100