[QST]About data regarding h100 in FP8 is inaccurate.
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
? - Needs Triage
inactive-30d
inactive-90d
question
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 10.5k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Avg merge
- 3d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
What is your question?
In instance 54 of Cutlass, I tested the FP8 data for PCIe H100, but this data does not reach the official standard. Is there anything I need to adjust? (I know the official value is a theoretical value, but this value is less than half of that.)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the FP8 result for PCIe H100 in CUTLASS instance 54 and compare it with the official theoretical value shown in the report. Determine whether the discrepancy comes from an adjustment in the benchmark setup or inaccurate data; done means the cause and any required correction are documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- hpc, performance
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100