[C++] [bridge] `measure_handle`: definite-assignment analysis
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 455
- Avg merge
- 1d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 165
Description
Background
PR #4409 introduced a static isBoundHandle walk in lib/Frontend/nvqpp/ConvertExpr.cpp that diagnoses
bool b = h; when h was default-constructed. The check is intentionally narrow and has two known unsoundness gaps, documented inline as "defer to a follow-up.
Gap 1: function arguments
__qpu__ bool f(cudaq::measure_handle h) { return h; }
isBoundHandle short-circuits on BlockArgument SSA values (if (!load) return true;). The bridge silently accepts the discriminate even though the caller may pass a default-constructed handle. Solving requires either per-callee verification at every call site that the argument is bound, or a runtime sentinel check at every quake.discriminate.
Gap 2: aggregate / array per-element tracking
For measure_handle hs[N]; and struct Holder { measure_handle h; };, any store anywhere into the base alloca is treated as binding regardless of which element / member is loaded. Per-cc.compute_ptr-index reasoning needs SSA-value index resolution, deferred from PR #4409.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start in lib/Frontend/nvqpp/ConvertExpr.cpp by reading the existing isBoundHandle walk and its inline notes about deferred gaps. Trace how BlockArgument values and aggregate or array allocas reach quake.discriminate, then define and validate sound handling for function arguments and per-element or per-member tracking.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100