Follow-up items from `dep-analysis` implementation

Required prerequisites

• Search the issue tracker to check if your feature has already been mentioned or rejected in other issues.

Describe the feature

In the interest of not holding up PR #2163, some open discussion items are being converted into an issue to track potential additional work items related to this pass.

• Reduce number of wires in default wire set: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1739368793
• Add reset calls after every mz in order to comply with the pass assumptions listed in the pass description. Otherwise, our own tests are testing with undefined behavior. https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1739374979
• Update some of the dependency analysis tests to use pass statistics instead of return values. https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1739377897
• Make pass understand quake.control types. https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1733500245
• Update tests to have non-constant if conditions: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1739383192
• Fix memory leaks: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1736832389
• TODO: If an unused wire flows through an if with a useful wire ...: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuda-quantum/pull/2163#discussion_r1736880288

Start with PR #2163, its dependency-analysis pass description, and the linked review discussions. The issue bundles seven separate items without naming files or defining a single completion target, so split one selected item into a focused issue with specific tests and a clear done condition before starting.