NVIDIA / NVIDIA/TransformerEngine
[PyTorch] Request a migration path for downstream `_GroupedLinear` integrations after the 2.17 signature change
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 3.5k
- Forks
- 831
- Avg merge
- 3d 11h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 65
Description
Describe the bug
Transformer Engine 2.17 intentionally changed the private PyTorch _GroupedLinear autograd call layout while making GroupedLinear graph-safe.
TE 2.16:
forward(ctx, inp, non_tensor_args, *weights_and_biases)
# non_tensor_args[0] is m_splits
TE 2.17:
forward(ctx, inp, m_splits, non_tensor_args, *weights_and_biases)
# m_splits is now a separate int64 tensor
# non_tensor_args[0] is use_bias
The change was introduced by f8bda5d0. The public GroupedLinear.forward accepts both list and tensor split inputs, while the internal linear_fn dispatch boundary changed positionally.
We understand that _GroupedLinear is private and that downstream users cannot assume its signature will remain stable. In practice, however, there does not appear to be a public functional or interception API for these use cases, so some downstream integrations currently use this boundary to intercept grouped GEMMs or invoke them with externally owned weights. Upgrading TE alone therefore causes deterministic runtime failures in those integrations.
Two downstream examples are affected:
-
NVIDIA ModelOpt intercepts the grouped-linear function to quantize its input and weights. Its compatibility logic finds
non_tensor_argsin the signature and readsnon_tensor_args[0]asm_splits. With TE 2.17, that value isuse_bias, so calibration fails with:File ".../transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py", line 1788, in forward out, new_workspaces = linear_fn( File ".../modelopt/torch/quantization/plugins/transformer_engine.py", line 178, in te_grouped_quantized_linear_fn num_gemms = len(args[sig_params.index("non_tensor_args") - ctx_offset][0]) TypeError: object of type 'bool' has no len()Tracking issue: NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer#1940
-
Megatron-Bridge directly calls
_GroupedLinear.apply/forwardwith externally owned grouped adapter weights. The TE 2.16 layout passesx, non_tensor_args, weights..., biases.... Under TE 2.17, the same call is shifted: the old tuple is interpreted asm_splits, the first weight is interpreted asnon_tensor_args, and the remaining weights and biases are mispartitioned. The downstream compatibility fix is NVIDIA-NeMo/Megatron-Bridge#4721.
Steps/Code to reproduce bug
The failure is reproduced by changing only the TE pin in Megatron-Bridge PR #4696:
- Passing baseline:
2.16.0+d64bc14datd64bc14dc87eb658ab98839e4b7687595ee53e2d - Failing version:
2.17.0+2e559f06at2e559f062497bef768dfbe9d7e45548fadeca80a - ModelOpt remains pinned at
nvidia-modelopt==0.44.0rc5
Run:
uv run python -m pytest -s -x \
tests/functional_tests/test_groups/quantization/models/qwen/test_qwen3_moe_quantization_workflow.py::TestQwen3MoeQuantizationWorkflow::test_qwen3_moe_quantization_and_generation_with_expert_parallelism
The first calibration forward fails at the len(False) exception shown above. The same failure occurs on both GB200 and H100 runners. Full failing job: Megatron-Bridge GitHub Actions.
The signature transition can also be confirmed directly:
import inspect
from transformer_engine.pytorch.module.grouped_linear import _GroupedLinear
print(inspect.signature(_GroupedLinear.forward))
Requested guidance / compatibility support
We will update the affected downstream integrations to handle the new layout. To make that migration less disruptive, would the TE maintainers consider publishing a TE 2.17.x patch release with a short-lived transition path for both grouped-linear call layouts?
# Legacy layout used through TE 2.16
(ctx, inp, non_tensor_args, *weights_and_biases)
# Graph-safe layout introduced in TE 2.17
(ctx, inp, m_splits, non_tensor_args, *weights_and_biases)
If practical, the compatibility path could cover both grad-enabled _GroupedLinear.apply and direct no-grad _GroupedLinear.forward dispatch, preserve the correct backward arity, and emit a deprecation warning for the legacy form before it is removed in a later feature release. We are not asking for indefinite compatibility for the private API.
Because wrappers such as ModelOpt intercept the linear_fn boundary before _GroupedLinear.forward executes, compatibility may need to be provided at that dispatch/hook boundary rather than only inside the autograd function. A regression test using a wrapped linear_fn would cover this downstream use case.
If dual-layout support at this private boundary is not feasible, guidance on the intended supported approach—or an equivalent stable functional/interception API—would be equally helpful. Public GroupedLinear owns its parameters, so it is not currently a drop-in replacement for callers that need to supply externally owned grouped weights.
Environment overview (please complete the following information)
- Environment location: GitHub Actions, Docker, GCP GPU runners
- Transformer Engine install: Git source pin resolved by
uv - Passing TE:
2.16.0+d64bc14d - Failing TE:
2.17.0+2e559f06 - Downstream packages: Megatron-Bridge PR #4696 and
nvidia-modelopt==0.44.0rc5
Environment details
- OS: Linux container
- Python: 3.12.3
- Transformer Engine: versions and exact commits listed above
- The full container and runner information is recorded in the linked GitHub Actions job.
Device details
- Reproduced on GB200 and H100 CI runners.
Additional context
The old and new contracts are straightforward for downstream code to distinguish when it owns the call: prefer the explicit m_splits parameter when present, otherwise use non_tensor_args[0]. The harder compatibility case is an interceptor that TE calls through the changed positional boundary, which is why a short TE-side transition window would be valuable.
This report concerns only the grouped-linear signature transition. It is independent of other TE 2.17 packaging or import behavior changes.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with transformer_engine/pytorch/module/grouped_linear.py and inspect the _GroupedLinear.forward signature and linear_fn dispatch around commit f8bda5d0. Run the listed Megatron-Bridge pytest target to reproduce the len(False) failure, then examine the linked ModelOpt and Megatron-Bridge compatibility examples. Done means the supported migration or transition behavior is documented and covered by a regression test for wrapped linear_fn calls.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python, pytorch
- Domain
- backend, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100