ONNX to TensorRT Error: Internal Error (kv_slice: optimization profile is missing values for shape input)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 13.4k
- Forks
- 2.4k
- Avg merge
- 5d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
When I tried to convert my onnx model to TensorRT model, I encountered the following error:
[TRT] [E] 4: [network.cpp::validate::3584] Error Code 4: Internal Error (kv_slice: optimization profile is missing values for shape input)
However, I have explicitly set the shape like below:
shapes = {
'position' : [(1, 1), (1, 1000), (1, 2000)],
'inputs_embeds': [(1, 1, 1792), (1, 1000, 1792), (1, 2000, 1792)],
'past_key_in0': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in0': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in1': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in1': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in2' : [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in2': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in3': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in3': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in4': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in4': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in5': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in5': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in6': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in6': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in7': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in7': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in8': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in8': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in9': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in9': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in10': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in10': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_key_in11': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'past_value_in11': [(1, 16, 1, 112), (1, 16, 1000, 112), (1, 16, 2000, 112)],
'kv_slice': [(1,), (1,), (1,)],
}
for order, (name, shape_list) in enumerate(shapes.items()):
print(order, name, shape_list)
min_shape, opt_shape, max_shape = shape_list
profile.set_shape(name, min_shape, opt_shape, max_shape)
set_min_shape, set_opt_shape, set_max_shape = profile.get_shape(name)
config.add_optimization_profile(profile)
engine = builder.build_serialized_network(network, config)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the shown shapes dictionary and the profile.set_shape calls, focusing on the kv_slice entry and the subsequent config.add_optimization_profile and builder.build_serialized_network calls. Reproduce the build with the reported shapes and identify why the optimization profile is rejected; done means the network builds without the missing-values error.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100