cudaCoreGemm and int8 sq gemm
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 14.7k
- Forks
- 2.8k
- Avg merge
- 2d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 489
Description
cudaCoreGemm and int8 sq gemm：
In these kernels, when m is smaller, it will be faster than tensor core. What is the theoretical basis?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the cudaCoreGemm and int8 sq gemm kernel implementations and any comparisons with tensor-core execution. Investigate why smaller m changes the performance tradeoff, then document the theoretical basis and supporting evidence so the question has a clear explanation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100