NVIDIA / NVIDIA/Model-Optimizer

ONNX PTQ: no NVFP4 path for convolutional models

Open
#2,281 0 comments 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@ajrasane is already working on this.

Since Aug 28, 2026.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
3.8k
Forks
604
Avg merge
2d 8h
Merged PRs (30d)
142

Description

Summary

The ONNX PTQ entry points expose NVFP4 for transformer-family models but not for convolutional
models. A CNN detector cannot request NVFP4 through the ONNX PTQ API at all — this is an
unreachable code path rather than a quality limitation, so it fails as "unsupported" rather than as
"poor accuracy".

Originally raised as a comment on #362, which is closed; re-filing standalone so it can be tracked.

Why it matters

We benchmark CNN detectors (YOLOv8/11/26-family) and a transformer detector (RT-DETRv2) through the
same export and quantization pipeline, and compare precisions across them. NVFP4 is reachable for
the transformer and not for the CNNs, so the comparison has a hole that is a property of the API
surface rather than of the models.

Environment

ModelOpt 0.46.0, ONNX PTQ path, explicit-QDQ (strongly typed) export.

What would help

Either an NVFP4 config selection path for convolutional graphs, or — if that is out of scope — an
explicit, early error naming NVFP4-on-CNN as unsupported, so callers do not have to discover it by
inspecting realized precisions afterwards.

I am happy to supply a representative CNN detector ONNX and the exact config that fails to select
NVFP4.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.