Performance testing of Amgx with SPE10
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Cuda
- Stars
- 692
- Forks
- 197
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Hi ,
We are new to Amgx application. On going through the "Readme" file, We came across the following blog link:
https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/amgx-v1-0-enabling-reservoir-simulation-with-classical-amg/
As per the link, we think Amgx was tested with SPE10 (Society of Petroleum Engineering) data sets. Found these two data set references from internet:
https://www.spe.org/web/csp/datasets/set01.htm
https://github.com/OPM/opm-data/blob/master/spe10model1/SPE10_MODEL1_CP.DATA
Note: Above data set contains only .txt, .dat files. whereas, Amgx uses .mtx and .json file as argument for validation. (eg: amgx_capi)
Can somebody provide steps how to use the Amgx with these(SPE10) data set for performance validation purpose?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the README and the amgx_capi example mentioned in the issue, then compare the SPE10 .txt and .dat datasets with the .mtx and .json arguments AMGX expects. Document the steps needed to use SPE10 for performance validation, including any required dataset preparation, so a user can reproduce the test.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- data, performance, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100